Haus Cx v. Minnesota Rebar Cx

497 N.W.2d 249, 1993 Minn. LEXIS 184, 1993 WL 86923
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 12, 1993
DocketNos. C6-92-1109, CX-92-1128 and C1-92-1891
StatusPublished

This text of 497 N.W.2d 249 (Haus Cx v. Minnesota Rebar Cx) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haus Cx v. Minnesota Rebar Cx, 497 N.W.2d 249, 1993 Minn. LEXIS 184, 1993 WL 86923 (Mich. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals in the above-entitled cases, filed May 20, 1992 and September 3, 1992, respectively, be, and the same are, affirmed without opinion. See Patrin v. Progressive Rehab Options, 497 N.W.2d 246 (Minn. 1993) (filed herewith).

Respondent Scott W. Haus and respondent John Stein are each entitled to attorney fees in the amount of $400.

PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patrin v. Progressive Rehab Options
497 N.W.2d 246 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
497 N.W.2d 249, 1993 Minn. LEXIS 184, 1993 WL 86923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haus-cx-v-minnesota-rebar-cx-minn-1993.