Hauptman v. New York Edison Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hauptman v. New York Edison Co.

152 N.Y.S. 1116

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 9, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 152 N.Y.S. 1116 (Hauptman v. New York Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hauptman v. New York Edison Co., 152 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by Mayer Plauptman, as administrator, etc., against the New York Edison Company. T. H. Beardsley, of New York City, for appellant. J. ,F. McIntyre, of New York City, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment [1117]*1117and order reversed, with costs, unless plaintiff stipulate to reduce verdict to the sum of $3,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, and the order appealed from, are affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. See, also, 160 App. Div. 917, 145 N. Y. Supp. 696.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by Mayer Plauptman, as administrator, etc., against the New York Edison Company. T. H. Beardsley, of New York City, for appellant. J. ,F. McIntyre, of New York City, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment [1117]*1117and order reversed, with costs, unless plaintiff stipulate to reduce verdict to the sum of $3,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, and the order appealed from, are affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. See, also, 160 App. Div. 917, 145 N. Y. Supp. 696.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hauptman-v-new-york-edison-co-nyappdiv-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack