Haun v. Robinson

California Supreme Court

Haun v. Robinson

162 Cal. 760

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 18, 1912

DocketS. F. No. 5793

StatusPublished

This text of 162 Cal. 760 (Haun v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haun v. Robinson, 162 Cal. 760 (Cal. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Appeal from an order granting a change of place of trial from the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to the superior court of Los Angeles County on the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 397, subd. 3.)

The order was affirmed from the bench for the reason that it satisfactorily appeared to the court that there was a sufficient showing made by the affidavit in support of the motion to sustain the conclusion of the lower court that “the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice” would be promoted by such a change.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Appeal from an order granting a change of place of trial from the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to the superior court of Los Angeles County on the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 397, subd. 3.)

The order was affirmed from the bench for the reason that it satisfactorily appeared to the court that there was a sufficient showing made by the affidavit in support of the motion to sustain the conclusion of the lower court that “the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice” would be promoted by such a change.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 Cal. 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haun-v-robinson-cal-1912.