Haun v. Packard Oklahoma Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Haun v. Packard Oklahoma Motor Co.

1924 OK 263, 224 P. 147, 98 Okla. 44, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 1124

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 4, 1924

Docket12597

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK 263 (Haun v. Packard Oklahoma Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haun v. Packard Oklahoma Motor Co., 1924 OK 263, 224 P. 147, 98 Okla. 44, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 1124 (Okla. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

This is an appeal from the district court of Tulsa county. The plaintiff in error filed his brief September 11, 1923. No. brief has been filed by the defendants in error and no extension of time has been given to file same and no reason ha.s been, assigned by the defendants in error as to why they have not filed brief. The brief of the plaintiff in error appears to reasonably sustain the assignments of error, and under the rule of this court, the record will not be searched to find some theory upon which the judgment of the lower court may be sustained.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed and remanded with instructions to the trial court to grant the plaintiff a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

This is an appeal from the district court of Tulsa county. The plaintiff in error filed his brief September 11, 1923. No. brief has been filed by the defendants in error and no extension of time has been given to file same and no reason ha.s been, assigned by the defendants in error as to why they have not filed brief. The brief of the plaintiff in error appears to reasonably sustain the assignments of error, and under the rule of this court, the record will not be searched to find some theory upon which the judgment of the lower court may be sustained.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed and remanded with instructions to the trial court to grant the plaintiff a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK 263, 224 P. 147, 98 Okla. 44, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haun-v-packard-oklahoma-motor-co-okla-1924.