Haulenbeck v. United States

84 F. 148, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2931
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedDecember 9, 1897
DocketNo. 2,102
StatusPublished

This text of 84 F. 148 (Haulenbeck v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haulenbeck v. United States, 84 F. 148, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2931 (circtsdny 1897).

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This importation is of olive pits ground. They are not edible. They were assessed under section 4, against a protest that they come under paragraph 24 of the act of 1890, which provides for—

“Drugs, such as barks, beans, berries, balsams, buds, bulbs and bulbous roots and excrescences, such as nut galls, fruits, flowers, dried fibre grains, gums, and gum resins, herbs, leaves, lichens, mosses, nuts, roots and stems, spices, vegetables, seeds (aromatic, not garden seeds), and seeds of morbid growth, weeds, woods used expressly for dyeing, and dried insects, any of the foregoing which are not edible, but which have been advanced in value, or condition, by refining, or grinding, or by other process of manufacture.”

It seems to fall within this class, as not edible, but advanced in manufacture by grinding.

Decision reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F. 148, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haulenbeck-v-united-states-circtsdny-1897.