Hauk v. Nicholson

36 La. Ann. 986
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 1, 1884·No. No. 9011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a suit for damages on account of libel, plaintiff cannot recover when defendant was not actuated by malice and the main facts of tuo charge were substantially true.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hauk v. Nicholson, 36 La. Ann. 986 (La. 1884).

36 La. Ann. 986 (Hauk v. Nicholson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller, Smith and Champagne v. Capital City Press
142 So. 2d 462 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1962)
Alloway v. Fitzgerald
103 So. 440 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)