Haughton v. State
175 S.W.3d 691, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1649, 2005 WL 2979248
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, Travis Haughton, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haughton v. State, 175 S.W.3d 691, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1649, 2005 WL 2979248 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
175 S.W.3d 691 (Haughton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.