Haughton v. State
152 So. 3d 797, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20088, 2014 WL 6910839
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s adjudications and sentences in these two consolidated appeals presented under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), but remand for the trial court to enter a written order which specifies the conditions of probation appellant was found to have violated in lower court case number 502008CF009036A. See Turner v. State, 84 So.3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Petrie v. State, 980 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Appellant need not be present.
[798] Affirmed but remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haughton v. State, 152 So. 3d 797, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20088, 2014 WL 6910839 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
152 So. 3d 797 (Haughton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Petrie v. State
980 So. 2d 1209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Turner v. State
84 So. 3d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)