Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Haughton v. State

Haughton v. State

152 So. 3d 797, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20088, 2014 WL 6910839
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 2014
DocketNos. 4D13-530, 4D13-531
StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 3d 797 (Haughton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haughton v. State, 152 So. 3d 797, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20088, 2014 WL 6910839 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s adjudications and sentences in these two consolidated appeals presented under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), but remand for the trial court to enter a written order which specifies the conditions of probation appellant was found to have violated in lower court case number 502008CF009036A. See Turner v. State, 84 So.3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Petrie v. State, 980 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Appellant need not be present.

[798]*798 Affirmed but remanded with instructions.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Petrie v. State
980 So. 2d 1209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Turner v. State
84 So. 3d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 3d 797, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20088, 2014 WL 6910839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haughton-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.