Haughtalling v. Bronk

New York Supreme Court

Haughtalling v. Bronk

3 Cai. Cas. 190, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 495

DecidedAugust 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 190 (Haughtalling v. Bronk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haughtalling v. Bronk, 3 Cai. Cas. 190, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 495 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

-£⅛* curiam, as there is no opposition take your rule#

Thompson, J.

I do'not see how it is possible for the court to grant the motion. If they do, the elector will be appointed contrary to the act, and all proceedings uncles' such a pannel consequently void. My opinion is, that you should have a new elector appointed in the same way as the others. I think we have a power to order the sheriff to summon another pannel; but I do not think we can direct another elector to be added.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-£⅛* curiam, as there is no opposition take your rule#

Thompson, J.

I do'not see how it is possible for the court to grant the motion. If they do, the elector will be appointed contrary to the act, and all proceedings uncles' such a pannel consequently void. My opinion is, that you should have a new elector appointed in the same way as the others. I think we have a power to order the sheriff to summon another pannel; but I do not think we can direct another elector to be added.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cai. Cas. 190, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haughtalling-v-bronk-nysupct-1805.