Haughran v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Haughran v. United States

1 F.2d 1021, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 1949

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 17, 1924·No. No. 4134·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record and briefs in this case and the statement of counsel in open court that the sole contention of plaintiffs in error is that the verdict of the jury is manifestly against the weight of the evidence. This court has no authority to consider and determine the weight of the evidence. R. S. § 1011 (Comp. Stat. § 1672); Roth v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 294 F. 475; Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 289 F. 29, 32. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record and briefs in this case and the statement of counsel in open court that the sole contention of plaintiffs in error is that the verdict of the jury is manifestly against the weight of the evidence. This court has no authority to consider and determine the weight of the evidence. R. S. § 1011 (Comp. Stat. § 1672); Roth v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 294 F. 475; Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 289 F. 29, 32. Judgment affirmed.

Haughran v. United States, 1 F.2d 1021, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 1949 (6th Cir. 1924).

Pincite

1 F.2d 1021 (Haughran v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related