Haughran v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Haughran v. United States

1 F.2d 1021, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 1949

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 17, 1924

DocketNo. 4134

StatusPublished

This text of 1 F.2d 1021 (Haughran v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haughran v. United States, 1 F.2d 1021, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 1949 (6th Cir. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record and briefs in this case and the statement of counsel in open court that the sole contention of plaintiffs in error is that the verdict of the jury is manifestly against the weight of the evidence. This court has no authority to consider and determine the weight of the evidence. R. S. § 1011 (Comp. Stat. § 1672); Roth v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 294 F. 475; Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 289 F. 29, 32. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record and briefs in this case and the statement of counsel in open court that the sole contention of plaintiffs in error is that the verdict of the jury is manifestly against the weight of the evidence. This court has no authority to consider and determine the weight of the evidence. R. S. § 1011 (Comp. Stat. § 1672); Roth v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 294 F. 475; Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 289 F. 29, 32. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 F.2d 1021, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 1949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haughran-v-united-states-ca6-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack