Haugh v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Haugh v. State

12 Tex. Ct. App. 343

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 1, 1882·Published

Opinion

Hurt, J.

The defendant was convicted for refusing to make out and render a list of his property liable to taxation in said county. The indictment nowhere alleges the year for which the list of the defendant’s taxable property was required to be made out. This is fatally defective. See this question discussed in Berry v. State, 10 Texas Ct. App. 315.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurt, J.

The defendant was convicted for refusing to make out and render a list of his property liable to taxation in said county. The indictment nowhere alleges the year for which the list of the defendant’s taxable property was required to be made out. This is fatally defective. See this question discussed in Berry v. State, 10 Texas Ct. App. 315.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Haugh v. State, 12 Tex. Ct. App. 343 (Tex. Ct. App. 1882).

Pincite

12 Tex. Ct. App. 343 (Haugh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.