Haugh v. Seabold
This text of 15 Ind. 343 (Haugh v. Seabold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William Seabold died. His estate was worth less than three hundred dollars. The Court vested it in the widow, Margaret Seabold. A part of that estate consisted of an account against Emanuel Haugh. Widow Sea-bold sued Haugh on this account. After William Sedbold’s death, Haugh bought a note which said Seabold had given in his lifetime, and pleaded it as a set-off to Widow Seabold’s demand on the above account. The Court refused to allow the set-off
We think this was right. The estate being of less value than three hundred dollars, the law gave it to the widow, and the account sued on was a part of it. No claim against William Seabold, acquired after his property vested in his widow, could be set-off against her in a suit to recover such vested estate.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ind. 343, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haugh-v-seabold-ind-1860.