Haugen v. Peterson
This text of 393 N.W.2d 372 (Haugen v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon the motion of Muriel Peterson for reconsideration of a denial of the original petition for further review, the petition for further review be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 N.W.2d 372, 1986 Minn. LEXIS 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haugen-v-peterson-minn-1986.