Haugen v. King

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Haugen v. King

164 N.W. 991, 138 Minn. 479, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 965

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 2, 1917

DocketNo. 20,562

StatusPublished

This text of 164 N.W. 991 (Haugen v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haugen v. King, 164 N.W. 991, 138 Minn. 479, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 965 (Mich. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note alleged to have been made by defendant in payment of goods purchased from plaintiff. The answer put in issue the making of the note, pleaded the infancy of defendant and the statute of limitations. The court found the facts against defendant, and the only question before the court on the appeal is whether the evidence supports the findings. The evidence returned in the record is sufficient. It requires no discussion. And since the facts are found adversely to defendant the questions of law raised by him cannot be considered. They are all predicated upon the facts as pleaded in the answer, which are wholly eliminated from the case by the findings.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note alleged to have been made by defendant in payment of goods purchased from plaintiff. The answer put in issue the making of the note, pleaded the infancy of defendant and the statute of limitations. The court found the facts against defendant, and the only question before the court on the appeal is whether the evidence supports the findings. The evidence returned in the record is sufficient. It requires no discussion. And since the facts are found adversely to defendant the questions of law raised by him cannot be considered. They are all predicated upon the facts as pleaded in the answer, which are wholly eliminated from the case by the findings.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 N.W. 991, 138 Minn. 479, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haugen-v-king-minn-1917.