Haugabook v. State

105 S.E. 381, 26 Ga. App. 63, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 273
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 16, 1920
Docket11727
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 381 (Haugabook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haugabook v. State, 105 S.E. 381, 26 Ga. App. 63, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 273 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the defendant; and since the verdict of guilty has the approval of the trial judge, and there being no assignments of error insisted upon except the general grounds of the motion for a new trial, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., oonour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 381, 26 Ga. App. 63, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haugabook-v-state-gactapp-1920.