Haugabook v. State
453 So. 2d 549, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1725, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 1984·No. No. 83-2204·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Reversed. The State failed to establish that appellant wilfully failed to seek her probation officer’s consent before leaving her approved residence, see Kotowski v. State, 344 So.2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) or that her financial condition was such that payment could be made, Winfield v. State, 406 So.2d 50 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haugabook v. State, 453 So. 2d 549, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1725, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
453 So. 2d 549 (Haugabook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. State
509 So. 2d 1288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)