Haugabook v. State

453 So. 2d 549, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1725, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 8, 1984
DocketNo. 83-2204
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 453 So. 2d 549 (Haugabook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haugabook v. State, 453 So. 2d 549, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1725, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. The State failed to establish that appellant wilfully failed to seek her probation officer’s consent before leaving her approved residence, see Kotowski v. State, 344 So.2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) or that her financial condition was such that payment could be made, Winfield v. State, 406 So.2d 50 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. State
509 So. 2d 1288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 So. 2d 549, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1725, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haugabook-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.