Hauer v. Bt Advisors, Inc.

Seventh Circuit

Hauer v. Bt Advisors, Inc.

671 F.2d 1020

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 19, 1982

DocketNos. 81-1512, 81-1602 and 81-1725

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 671 F.2d 1020 (Hauer v. Bt Advisors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hauer v. Bt Advisors, Inc., 671 F.2d 1020 (7th Cir. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James A. Hauer sued Sackman-Gilliland Corporation for intentionally interfering with his employment relationship with Professional Investors Syndicate. Although the jury returned a verdict in favor of Hauer, the district court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. In entering this order the district court thoroughly and carefully analyzed all the issues raised in this appeal. Accordingly, we affirm and adopt the excellent opinion of the district court which is reported at 509 F.Supp. 168.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James A. Hauer sued Sackman-Gilliland Corporation for intentionally interfering with his employment relationship with Professional Investors Syndicate. Although the jury returned a verdict in favor of Hauer, the district court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. In entering this order the district court thoroughly and carefully analyzed all the issues raised in this appeal. Accordingly, we affirm and adopt the excellent opinion of the district court which is reported at 509 F.Supp. 168.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

671 F.2d 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hauer-v-bt-advisors-inc-ca7-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack