Hauck v. Safir

282 A.D.2d 403, 725 N.Y.S.2d 9, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4077
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered March 17, 2000, which denied and dismissed the petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s revocation of petitioner’s rifle/ shotgun permit and target pistol license, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Substantial testimonial and documentary evidence that petitioner, a licensed plumber, made harassing phone calls to an elderly woman in which he threatened her property, and made her fear for her safety if she did not pay a disputed bill issued by petitioner, supports respondent’s revocation of petitioner’s gun permits. In light of such evidence, we find no abuse of discretion by respondent (Matter of Fondacaro v Kelly, 234 AD2d 173, 177, lv denied 89 NY2d 812). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hauck v. Safir, 282 A.D.2d 403, 725 N.Y.S.2d 9, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 403 (Hauck v. Safir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wong v. Kelly
12 A.D.3d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)