Hatzel v. Hoffman House
2 A.D. 120, 37 N.Y.S. 598, 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 295
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This appeal raises only one question, to wit: Whether the answer of the defendant set up a counterclaim and thus rendered it incumbent upon the plaintiffs to serve a reply.
The suit was instituted to recover for labor, material and services in furnishing an electric plant for the Hoffman House.
The answer material to this discussion contained the following, to wit:
“Fourth. That the plaintiffs entered into a contract with the owner of the premises known as the- Hoffman House, to fully and properly perfect and install electric lighting appliances and appurtenances, in and about said premises, and it was agreed in pursuance of said contract that a great portion of the work * * * for which the plaintiffs seek to recover * * * were charged for under and pursuant to said contract, and were paid for by said landlord. * * *
[121] “ Defendant denies that said work and materials sued for herein were all extra and not included in the said contract, and avers that a great portion .of said work and materials were required to be done and furnished under said contract. * * *
“ Fifth. It was agreed by and between the plaintiffs and defendant that for the work, labor and services referred to in the complaint herein, the plaintiffsFootnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hatzel v. Hoffman House, 2 A.D. 120, 37 N.Y.S. 598, 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).
2 A.D. 120 (Hatzel v. Hoffman House) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McGee v. Felter
75 Misc. 349 (New York County Courts, 1912)