Hatton v. Wilmington City Railway Co.
50 A. 633, 19 Del. 159, 3 Penne. 159, 1901 Del. LEXIS 8
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided March 14, 1901·No. Action on the Case No. 128·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We hold, under the married woman’s law of this State, that the wife may bring such action in her own name. The demurrer is sustained.
At the election of defendant’s counsel, let the judgment of respondeat ouster be entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hatton v. Wilmington City Railway Co., 50 A. 633, 19 Del. 159, 3 Penne. 159, 1901 Del. LEXIS 8 (Del. Ct. App. 1901).
50 A. 633 (Hatton v. Wilmington City Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yonner v. Adams
167 A.2d 717 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1961)
Wolf v. Keagy
136 A. 520 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1927)
Eliason v. Draper
77 A. 572 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1910)