Hatton v. Wilmington City Railway Co.
50 A. 633, 19 Del. 159, 3 Penne. 159, 1901 Del. LEXIS 8
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedMarch 14, 1901
DocketAction on the Case No. 128
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 50 A. 633 (Hatton v. Wilmington City Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hatton v. Wilmington City Railway Co., 50 A. 633, 19 Del. 159, 3 Penne. 159, 1901 Del. LEXIS 8 (Del. Ct. App. 1901).
Opinion
We hold, under the married woman’s law of this State, that the wife may bring such action in her own name. The demurrer is sustained.
At the election of defendant’s counsel, let the judgment of respondeat ouster be entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Yonner v. Adams
167 A.2d 717 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1961)
Wolf v. Keagy
136 A. 520 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1927)
Eliason v. Draper
77 A. 572 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
50 A. 633, 19 Del. 159, 3 Penne. 159, 1901 Del. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatton-v-wilmington-city-railway-co-delsuperct-1901.