Hatton v. State

93 S.W.2d 444, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 792
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 15, 1936
DocketNo. 18200
StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.W.2d 444 (Hatton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hatton v. State, 93 S.W.2d 444, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 792 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of murder with malice aforethought; and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of seven years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The [445]*445indictment appears to be regular and in due form. Hence no questions are presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.W.2d 444, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatton-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.