Hatton v. State

895 So. 2d 465, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1013, 2005 WL 263795
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 2005·No. No. 5D03-2286·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

TTT . We affirm the sentence imposed upon Christopher Hatton; however, we remand to correct a scrivener’s error that occurred when the sentencing order incorrectly designated the sentence as a habitual violent felony offender sentence when it should have been designated as a habitual felony offender sentence.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, C.J., PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hatton v. State, 895 So. 2d 465, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1013, 2005 WL 263795 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

895 So. 2d 465 (Hatton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.