Hatton

Court of Claims

Hatton

173 Ct. Cl. 1187, 1965 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 209, 1965 WL 1503

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedNovember 19, 1965

DocketNo. 407-64

StatusPublished

This text of 173 Ct. Cl. 1187 (Hatton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hatton, 173 Ct. Cl. 1187, 1965 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 209, 1965 WL 1503 (cc 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Civilian pay; dismissal. — Plaintiff sues to recover back pay for the position from which he was dismissed by the Depart[1188]*1188ment of Agriculture. The case came before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof and without oral argument the court concluded that plaintiff’s claim was barred under the doctrine of laches and for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, and on November 19,1965, the petition was dismissed. Plaintiff’s petition for a writ of certiorari was denied May 31, 1966,384 U.S. 965.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civilian pay; dismissal. — Plaintiff sues to recover back pay for the position from which he was dismissed by the Depart[1188]*1188ment of Agriculture. The case came before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof and without oral argument the court concluded that plaintiff’s claim was barred under the doctrine of laches and for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, and on November 19,1965, the petition was dismissed. Plaintiff’s petition for a writ of certiorari was denied May 31, 1966,384 U.S. 965.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 Ct. Cl. 1187, 1965 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 209, 1965 WL 1503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatton-cc-1965.