Hattier v. Nethery

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 16, 2007·No. 06-30221·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 16, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30221

CRAIG J. HATTIER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DORIS GALMICHE NETHERY, Individually; DORIS GALMICHE NETHERY, As the Limited Curatrix of James, “Jackie,” J. Galmiche; WILBERT GLEN NETHERY,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (2:05-CV-4011) --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Our review of the record on appeal and the arguments set forth

in the briefs of counsel convince us that Plaintiff-Appellant Craig

J. Hattier has failed to state any claim that is cognizable under

federal law.

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hattier v. Nethery, (5th Cir. 2007).

Hattier v. Nethery (Hattier v. Nethery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.