Hattie v. Gehin
76 A. 4, 76 N.J. Eq. 340, 6 Buchanan 340, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 330
Opinion
The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon—15.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hattie v. Gehin, 76 A. 4, 76 N.J. Eq. 340, 6 Buchanan 340, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 330 (N.J. 1909).
76 A. 4 (Hattie v. Gehin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jordan v. Landis
175 So. 241 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Oak Investment Corp. v. Martin
151 A. 874 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Bennett v. Baltimore Humane Impartial Society & Aged Women's & Aged Men's Homes
45 A. 888 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1900)