Hattie Ray King and James Albert King v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Hattie Ray King and James Albert King v. United States

327 F.2d 495

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 1964

Docket20466_1

StatusPublished

This text of 327 F.2d 495 (Hattie Ray King and James Albert King v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hattie Ray King and James Albert King v. United States, 327 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration, we conclude that’ there is no substance in the grounds asserted for this appeal. Counsel took no exceptions to the charge of the court, thus failing to preserve any claim of error arising from the charge. We think it is plain that there is no basis for the contention here made that the trial court’s comments on the evidence constituted substantial error against appellants.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration, we conclude that’ there is no substance in the grounds asserted for this appeal. Counsel took no exceptions to the charge of the court, thus failing to preserve any claim of error arising from the charge. We think it is plain that there is no basis for the contention here made that the trial court’s comments on the evidence constituted substantial error against appellants.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 F.2d 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hattie-ray-king-and-james-albert-king-v-united-states-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack