Hattie Ray King and James Albert King v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Hattie Ray King and James Albert King v. United States

327 F.2d 495

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 3, 1964·No. 20466_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration, we conclude that’ there is no substance in the grounds asserted for this appeal. Counsel took no exceptions to the charge of the court, thus failing to preserve any claim of error arising from the charge. We think it is plain that there is no basis for the contention here made that the trial court’s comments on the evidence constituted substantial error against appellants.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration, we conclude that’ there is no substance in the grounds asserted for this appeal. Counsel took no exceptions to the charge of the court, thus failing to preserve any claim of error arising from the charge. We think it is plain that there is no basis for the contention here made that the trial court’s comments on the evidence constituted substantial error against appellants.

The judgment is affirmed.

Hattie Ray King and James Albert King v. United States, 327 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

327 F.2d 495 (Hattie Ray King and James Albert King v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related