Hattie Populus Cooper v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Wm. M. Bekurs, Etc., Third-Party

469 F.2d 693, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6388
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 7, 1972·No. 72-2163·Published

Opinion

469 F.2d 693

Hattie Populus COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Third-Party
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Wm. M. BEKURS, etc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.

No, 72-2163 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 7, 1972.

William F. Wessel, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Brock B. Gordon, Mobile, Ala., for Metropolitan.

J. Edward Thornton, Mobile, Ala., for Bekurs.

Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgement is affirmed. Appellee's motion to impose penalties is denied.

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hattie Populus Cooper v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Wm. M. Bekurs, Etc., Third-Party, 469 F.2d 693, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6388 (3d Cir. 1972).

469 F.2d 693 (Hattie Populus Cooper v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Wm. M. Bekurs, Etc., Third-Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related