Hattie Populus Cooper v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Wm. M. Bekurs, Etc., Third-Party
This text of 469 F.2d 693 (Hattie Populus Cooper v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Wm. M. Bekurs, Etc., Third-Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
469 F.2d 693
Hattie Populus COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Third-Party
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Wm. M. BEKURS, etc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
No, 72-2163 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 7, 1972.
William F. Wessel, New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Brock B. Gordon, Mobile, Ala., for Metropolitan.
J. Edward Thornton, Mobile, Ala., for Bekurs.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgement is affirmed. Appellee's motion to impose penalties is denied.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 F.2d 693, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hattie-populus-cooper-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-company-ca3-1972.