Hattie Carnegie, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hattie Carnegie, Inc. v. United States

17 Cust. Ct. 348, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 909

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 3, 1946

DocketNo. 6403; Entry No. WHB 3213, etc.

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 348 (Hattie Carnegie, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hattie Carnegie, Inc. v. United States, 17 Cust. Ct. 348, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 909 (cusc 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

[349]*349Undisputed facts show export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

[349]*349Undisputed facts show export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Cust. Ct. 348, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hattie-carnegie-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1946.