Hatterman v. Tieman

182 Ill. App. 24
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 9, 1913·No. Gen. No. 17,960·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 789*—when hill of exceptions unnecessary. Bill of exceptions in a chancery cause is neither necessary nor proper, unless it he to preserve oral evidence introduced upon the hearing under the statute allowing it to be done. 3. Appeal and ebbob, § 855*—when certificate of evidence not necessary. Evidence need not be preserved by a certificate of the chancellor when there is a report of the master in chancery. The master’s report is a part of the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hatterman v. Tieman, 182 Ill. App. 24 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

182 Ill. App. 24 (Hatterman v. Tieman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.