Hatterman v. Tieman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Hatterman v. Tieman

182 Ill. App. 24

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 9, 1913

DocketGen. No. 17,960

StatusPublished

This text of 182 Ill. App. 24 (Hatterman v. Tieman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hatterman v. Tieman, 182 Ill. App. 24 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 789*—when hill of exceptions unnecessary. Bill of exceptions in a chancery cause is neither necessary nor proper, unless it he to preserve oral evidence introduced upon the hearing under the statute allowing it to be done. 3. Appeal and ebbob, § 855*—when certificate of evidence not necessary. Evidence need not be preserved by a certificate of the chancellor when there is a report of the master in chancery. The master’s report is a part of the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § 789*—when hill of exceptions unnecessary. Bill of exceptions in a chancery cause is neither necessary nor proper, unless it he to preserve oral evidence introduced upon the hearing under the statute allowing it to be done. 3. Appeal and ebbob, § 855*—when certificate of evidence not necessary. Evidence need not be preserved by a certificate of the chancellor when there is a report of the master in chancery. The master’s report is a part of the record.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 Ill. App. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatterman-v-tieman-illappct-1913.