Home/Federal Circuit/Hatter v. United States

Hatter v. United States

199 F.3d 1316, 1999 WL 1315654
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 20, 1999·No. No. 97-5093·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Each party has filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.

[1317] Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Both petitions for panel rehearing are denied.

(2) The petition for rehearing en banc of the Appellants is granted.

(3) The petition for rehearing en banc of the Appellee is denied.

(4) The judgment of the court entered on August 5, 1999, and reported in 185 F.3d 1356 (Fed.Cir.1999), is vacated and the opinion of the court accompanying the judgment is withdrawn with respect to part 3.

(5) Additional briefing and argument are not indicated at this time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hatter v. United States, 199 F.3d 1316, 1999 WL 1315654 (Fed. Cir. 1999).

199 F.3d 1316 (Hatter v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swisher International, Inc. v. United States
178 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (Court of International Trade, 2001)
Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr., Mary Martin Arceneaux, on Behalf to the Late Judge George Arceneaux, Jr., Judge Peter H. Beer, Judge Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., Dolores Lee Burciaga, of the Estate of Chief Judge Juan G. Burciaga, Judge A.J. McNamara Judge Harry Pregerson, Judge Raul A. Ramirez, Judge Norman C. Roettger, Jr., Chief Judge Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr., Chief Judge Terence T. Evans, Judge Henry A. Mentz, Jr., Chief Judge Wilbur D. Owens, Jr., Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr., Judge Harold A. Baker and Chief Judge Michael M. Mihm, Plaintiffs v. United States
199 F.3d 1316 (Federal Circuit, 1999)