Hatter v. Myerson
113 A.D.3d 728, 978 N.Y.2d 893
Opinion
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in concluding that the additional discovery of financial documents sought by the appellant was neither material nor necessary in the defense of the action (see CFLR 3101 [a]; Constantino v Dock’s Clam Bar & Pasta House, 60 AD3d 612 [2009]).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Cohen, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hatter v. Myerson, 113 A.D.3d 728, 978 N.Y.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 728 (Hatter v. Myerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Constantino v. Dock's Clam Bar & Pasta House
60 A.D.3d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)