Hatter v. Myerson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hatter v. Myerson

113 A.D.3d 728, 978 N.Y.2d 893

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.D.3d 728 (Hatter v. Myerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hatter v. Myerson, 113 A.D.3d 728, 978 N.Y.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in concluding that the additional discovery of financial documents sought by the appellant was neither material nor necessary in the defense of the action (see CFLR 3101 [a]; Constantino v Dock’s Clam Bar & Pasta House, 60 AD3d 612 [2009]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Cohen, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in concluding that the additional discovery of financial documents sought by the appellant was neither material nor necessary in the defense of the action (see CFLR 3101 [a]; Constantino v Dock’s Clam Bar & Pasta House, 60 AD3d 612 [2009]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Cohen, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A.D.3d 728, 978 N.Y.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatter-v-myerson-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack