Hatter v. Barlow

Supreme Court of Florida

Hatter v. Barlow

86 Fla. 637

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 7, 1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from interlocutory orders sustaining demurrers of amended bills of complaint.

Upon full consideration of the record, it appears that the amended bills of complaint do not wholly fail to state an equity in favor of- the complainants, therefore the general demurrers to the amended bills ,of complaint should not have been sustained.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from interlocutory orders sustaining demurrers of amended bills of complaint.

Upon full consideration of the record, it appears that the amended bills of complaint do not wholly fail to state an equity in favor of- the complainants, therefore the general demurrers to the amended bills ,of complaint should not have been sustained.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Hatter v. Barlow, 86 Fla. 637 (Fla. 1924).

Pincite

86 Fla. 637 (Hatter v. Barlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related