Hatten v. State

263 S.W. 312, 98 Tex. Crim. 115, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 504
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 4, 1924·No. No. 8471.·Published

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Port Bend County of rape, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.

*116 The facts amply support the verdict. There are four bills of exception in the record, Nos. 1 and 2 complaining of the admission of proof to show that the alleged rape was committed by force, and that the court refused to strike out testimony to that effect, and Nos. 3 and 4 complaining of the testimony of physicians to the inflamed and lacerated condition in which they found the private parts of prosecutrix, after . the alleged rape. Authorities will be found collated by Mr. Branch at page 995 of his Annotated P. C. supporting the proposition that even though the allegation be of a statutory rape, the State is entitled to show that the rape was by force. These authorities cover the contention made by appellant in each of the bills of exception and negative the claim of injury or that there was error in the admission of the testimony" complained of.

The evidence supporting the judgment and no error appearing, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hatten v. State, 263 S.W. 312, 98 Tex. Crim. 115, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 504 (Tex. 1924).

263 S.W. 312 (Hatten v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.