Hatten v. State
578 So. 2d 841, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3907, 1991 WL 65940
Opinions
We affirm the conviction and sentence. However, we reverse the imposition of costs because the costs were imposed without adequate notice to and an opportunity to be heard by the defendant. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hatten v. State, 578 So. 2d 841, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3907, 1991 WL 65940 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
578 So. 2d 841 (Hatten v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Murphy v. State
511 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)