Hattaway & Rambo v. Sanderlin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hattaway & Rambo v. Sanderlin

94 S.E. 864, 21 Ga. App. 544, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 398

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 21, 1918

Docket8640

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 864 (Hattaway & Rambo v. Sanderlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hattaway & Rambo v. Sanderlin, 94 S.E. 864, 21 Ga. App. 544, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 398 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The court did not err in sustaining the objections to testimony, as complained of in the fourth, fifth, and sixth grounds of the ■ motion for a new trial.

2. The charge of the court, when read as a whole, fully and fairly submitted the issue's raised by the pleadings. There was evidence au- . thorizing the verdict; and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, it was not error, for any of the reasons assigned, to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenhins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. The court did not err in sustaining the objections to testimony, as complained of in the fourth, fifth, and sixth grounds of the ■ motion for a new trial.

2. The charge of the court, when read as a whole, fully and fairly submitted the issue's raised by the pleadings. There was evidence au- . thorizing the verdict; and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, it was not error, for any of the reasons assigned, to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenhins, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.E. 864, 21 Ga. App. 544, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hattaway-rambo-v-sanderlin-gactapp-1918.