Hattan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hattan v. State

1971 OK CR 462, 492 P.2d 670

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 9, 1971

DocketNo. A-16787

StatusPublished

This text of 1971 OK CR 462 (Hattan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hattan v. State, 1971 OK CR 462, 492 P.2d 670 (Okla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

Kénneth Wayne Hattan, hereinafter referred to as defendant Hattan and Miles Austin Bigsby, were charged in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma for the offenses of Rape in the First Degree and Sodomy. The defendants were tried conjointly, and at the conclusion of said trial the jury returned a verdict of not guilty in the Rape in the First Degree charge, and found the defendants guilty for the crime of Sodomy. Their punishments were fixed at five (5) years imprisonment, and from said judgment and sentence, defendant Hattan has perfected a timely appeal to this Court.

We do not deem it necessary to recite the statement of facts, as the companion’s case, Bigsby v. State, Okl.Cr., 489 P.2d 1352 has been reviewed and affirmed by this Court on October 18, 1971. The propositions asserted in the instant case are similar to those asserted in Bigsby, supra. We have carefully examined each of the propositions asserted in the instant case and are of the opinion that they are without merit. For the reasons set forth in Bigsby, supra, the judgment and sentence is accordingly affirmed

BRETT, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

Kénneth Wayne Hattan, hereinafter referred to as defendant Hattan and Miles Austin Bigsby, were charged in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma for the offenses of Rape in the First Degree and Sodomy. The defendants were tried conjointly, and at the conclusion of said trial the jury returned a verdict of not guilty in the Rape in the First Degree charge, and found the defendants guilty for the crime of Sodomy. Their punishments were fixed at five (5) years imprisonment, and from said judgment and sentence, defendant Hattan has perfected a timely appeal to this Court.

We do not deem it necessary to recite the statement of facts, as the companion’s case, Bigsby v. State, Okl.Cr., 489 P.2d 1352 has been reviewed and affirmed by this Court on October 18, 1971. The propositions asserted in the instant case are similar to those asserted in Bigsby, supra. We have carefully examined each of the propositions asserted in the instant case and are of the opinion that they are without merit. For the reasons set forth in Bigsby, supra, the judgment and sentence is accordingly affirmed

BRETT, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1971 OK CR 462, 492 P.2d 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hattan-v-state-oklacrimapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack