Hatley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hatley v. State

548 S.W.3d 924

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2018·No. No. ED 105991·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*925Anthony G. Hatley appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment," denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*925Anthony G. Hatley appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment," denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hatley v. State, 548 S.W.3d 924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

548 S.W.3d 924 (Hatley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.