Hatley v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hatley v. Division of Employment Security

330 S.W.3d 164, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1806

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 30, 2010·No. WD 72453·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Valerie Hatley appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Hatley was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, Hatley claims that the Commission’s findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Because a pub *165 lished opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Valerie Hatley appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Hatley was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, Hatley claims that the Commission’s findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Because a pub *165 lished opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Hatley v. Division of Employment Security, 330 S.W.3d 164, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1806 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

330 S.W.3d 164 (Hatley v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related