Hatler & Osborne v. Hunter & Lee

1 White & W. 13
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 12, 1877
DocketNo. 28, Op. Book No. 1, p. 164
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 13 (Hatler & Osborne v. Hunter & Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hatler & Osborne v. Hunter & Lee, 1 White & W. 13 (Tex. Ct. App. 1877).

Opinion

Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 9. Demurrer and exceptions. Any irreconcilable repugnancies between the original and amended petitions should be taken advantage of by exceptions or demurrer.

§ 10. Amendments of pleading. Smith v. McGauhey is cited, where it is held that the rules respecting the effect of a departure in pleading can have no application to amendments under our system. Where a party seeks to introduce, by amendment, matter which cannot be properly joined, the court on exceptions will exclude the proposed amendment. But the attempted amendment, however inconsistent or repugnant to, or however wide a departure from the case first stated, will not of course vitiate and annul the former pleading of the party. [13 Tex. 464.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith's Adm'r v. McGaughey
13 Tex. 464 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatler-osborne-v-hunter-lee-texapp-1877.