Hathorn v. King

8 Mass. 371
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1811
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Mass. 371 (Hathorn v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hathorn v. King, 8 Mass. 371 (Mass. 1811).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The physicians may be inquired of, whether, from the circumstances of the patient, and the symptoms they observed, they are capable of forming an opinion of the soundness of her mind, and if so, whether they from * thence con-elude that her mind was sound or unsound; and in either case, they, must state the circumstances or symptoms from, which they draw their conclusions.

After the examination was finished, the evidence was minutely summed up to the jury by Sedgwick, J., and the jury were instructed by him (Sewall and Parker, justices, expressly concurring) that if they should be of opinion, that the testatrix, at the time of dictating the will, had sufficient discretion for that purpose, and that, at the time of executing the will, she was able to recollect the particulars which she had so dictated, they might find their verdict that she was of sound and disposing mind and memory at the time of executing the will. — And they found accordingly; and the will was proved, approved, and allowed by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Mass. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hathorn-v-king-mass-1811.