Hathcock v. State
This text of 992 So. 2d 918 (Hathcock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Herbert HATHCOCK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Herbert Hathcock, Monticello, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Herbert Hathcock appeals an order denying his motion to recuse and the order summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As in Brown v. State, 980 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), we quash the order denying his motion to recuse, vacate the order denying the rule 3.850 motion, and remand with instructions that the case be reassigned to a different judge. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(j); Berube v. State, 978 So.2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), Johnson v. State, 968 So.2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Schisler v. State, 958 So.2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
SHAHOOD, C.J., STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
992 So. 2d 918, 2008 WL 4723613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hathcock-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.