Hathcock v. State

522 So. 2d 86, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 727, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1028, 1988 WL 21131
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 1988
DocketNo. 88-0357
StatusPublished

This text of 522 So. 2d 86 (Hathcock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hathcock v. State, 522 So. 2d 86, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 727, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1028, 1988 WL 21131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief was not timely filed in accordance with the provisions of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 So. 2d 86, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 727, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1028, 1988 WL 21131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hathcock-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.