Hathcock v. Hathcock

782 So. 2d 929, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3979, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 901
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 2001·No. No. 1D00-3660·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, Donna Hathcock and Rick’s B.P., Inc., the current wife of respondent Ricky W. Hathcock and a corporation controlled by her, seek review of an order compelling production of documents in a proceeding on a motion to modify child support filed by respondent Cindy P. Summerhill, the former wife of Mr. Hathcock, by which she seeks to require her former husband to pay increased child support. Because petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction or departed from the essential requirements of law, the petition for a writ of certiorari is DENIED. See Smith v. Smith, 764 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

BOOTH, KAHN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hathcock v. Hathcock, 782 So. 2d 929, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3979, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 901 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

782 So. 2d 929 (Hathcock v. Hathcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Smith
764 So. 2d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)