Hathaway v. City of Atlanta

77 S.E. 916, 12 Ga. App. 648, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 682
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 16, 1913
Docket4737
StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.E. 916 (Hathaway v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hathaway v. City of Atlanta, 77 S.E. 916, 12 Ga. App. 648, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 682 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. According to the answer of the magistrate, the defendant made no motion for a continuance; and, since he appeared in response to the notice directing him to appear before the court, and entered fully into his defense to the charge preferred against him, the defects ■ in the' form of the notice or summons were thereby waived as immaterial circumstances. Mayson v. Atlanta, 77 Ga. 662.

2j The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction of the accused, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayson v. City of Atlanta
77 Ga. 662 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 916, 12 Ga. App. 648, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hathaway-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1913.