Hathaway v. Attorney Grievance Commission
728 N.W.2d 229, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 675, 2007 WL 840927
This text of 728 N.W.2d 229 (Hathaway v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hathaway v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 728 N.W.2d 229, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 675, 2007 WL 840927 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Hon. Michael HATHAWAY, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The defendant's motion for permission to file an ex parte sealed answer is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION v. Michigan Department of Treasury
728 N.W.2d 229 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
728 N.W.2d 229, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 675, 2007 WL 840927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hathaway-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2007.