Hathaway v. Attorney Grievance Commission
728 N.W.2d 229, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 675, 2007 WL 840927
Opinion
Hon. Michael HATHAWAY, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The defendant's motion for permission to file an ex parte sealed answer is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hathaway v. Attorney Grievance Commission, 728 N.W.2d 229, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 675, 2007 WL 840927 (Mich. 2007).
728 N.W.2d 229 (Hathaway v. Attorney Grievance Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION v. Michigan Department of Treasury
728 N.W.2d 229 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)