Hatfield v. Hatfield

City of New York Municipal Court

Hatfield v. Hatfield

15 N.Y. St. Rep. 788

DecidedMay 15, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 788 (Hatfield v. Hatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hatfield v. Hatfield, 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 788 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Me Adam, Oh. J.

—If execution be returned satisfied, the plaintiff may proceed against the sheriff by rule of court— i. e., attachment—or by action. Tidd’s Pr. (Am. Notes), 1019; Graham’s Pr. (2d ed.), 366; Crocker on Sheriffs, § 424. It is a necessary part of the return that the sum realized (unless paid to the judgment creditor or his attorney) be brought into court. Adams v. Bowe, 3 Civ. Pro. R., 194, 195; Crocker on Sheriffs, § 424.

Motion for attachment granted, unless within ten days the sum of $383.74, with interest from the time of the return—to wit, April 14, 1888-—is paid into court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me Adam, Oh. J.

—If execution be returned satisfied, the plaintiff may proceed against the sheriff by rule of court— i. e., attachment—or by action. Tidd’s Pr. (Am. Notes), 1019; Graham’s Pr. (2d ed.), 366; Crocker on Sheriffs, § 424. It is a necessary part of the return that the sum realized (unless paid to the judgment creditor or his attorney) be brought into court. Adams v. Bowe, 3 Civ. Pro. R., 194, 195; Crocker on Sheriffs, § 424.

Motion for attachment granted, unless within ten days the sum of $383.74, with interest from the time of the return—to wit, April 14, 1888-—is paid into court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 N.Y. St. Rep. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatfield-v-hatfield-nynyccityct-1888.