Hatfield v. Cline

141 Ky. 655
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided July 1, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Hobson

On motion to dismiss appeal — Motion sustained.

Appellant did not file the transcript in time. The time had expired when he took out a rule against the clerk. It was incumbent on him to have the time extended before it expired. An appeal may now be granted by the clerk of this Court. The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hatfield v. Cline, 141 Ky. 655 (Ky. Ct. App. 1911).

141 Ky. 655 (Hatfield v. Cline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edge v. City of Lexington
93 S.W.2d 854 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1936)