Hatcher v. Jones

53 Ga. 208
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1874·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

McCay, Judge.

The bankrupt was well aware that he had given this mortgage, and it was his own fault to have taken his exemption on the property mortgaged. The bankrupt act expressly preserves the liens of mortgages, and if the mortgagee does not prove his debt, he may proceed with his mortgage without reference [209]*209to the proceedings in bankruptcy. Had the assignee so determined, he might have forced the mortgagee into the bankrupt court. If the claim of the bankrupt for exemption was superior to the mortgage, and it was necessary to settle the rights of the parties, to call the mortgagee before the bankrupt court, we doubt not it could have been done. But unless (lie mortgagee, either by his own volition or by proceedings for the purpose, is before the bankrupt court, any disposition of property there is always subject to incumbrances.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hatcher v. Jones, 53 Ga. 208 (Ga. 1874).

53 Ga. 208 (Hatcher v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Peoples National Bank
35 S.E. 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Broach v. Powell
3 S.E. 763 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1887)
Merrill v. Jordan
60 N.H. 425 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1880)