Hatcher v. Harkleroad
This text of Hatcher v. Harkleroad (Hatcher v. Harkleroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6411
EDDIE HATCHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SID HARKLEROAD, Superintendent at Marion Correctional Institution; BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons at NC DOC; THEODIS BECK, Secretary of NC DOC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-25-1-1-MU)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 28, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Hatcher, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Eddie Hatcher appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Hatcher v. Harkleroad, No. CA-02-25-1-1-MU
(W.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hatcher v. Harkleroad, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatcher-v-harkleroad-ca4-2002.