Home/Supreme Court/Hatcher v. Deutscher

Hatcher v. Deutscher

506 U.S. 935, 113 S. Ct. 367
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 19, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1633
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 506 U.S. 935 (Hatcher v. Deutscher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hatcher v. Deutscher, 506 U.S. 935, 113 S. Ct. 367 (1992).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Sawyer v. Whitley, 505 U.S. 333 (1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKenna v. McDaniel
65 F.3d 1483 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Rickman v. Dutton
854 F. Supp. 1305 (M.D. Tennessee, 1994)
Henry Deutscher, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ron Angelone, Director of the Nevada Department of Prisons, Frankie Sue Del Papa, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Respondents-Appellees-Cross- Herbert F. Ahlswede, Clark County Deputy Public Defender on Relation of Henry Deutscher v. Charles Wolff, Director, Dept. Of Prisons, & Robert Lippold, Superintendent, Maximum Security Prison
16 F.3d 981 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Deutscher v. Angelone
16 F.3d 981 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 U.S. 935, 113 S. Ct. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatcher-v-deutscher-scotus-1992.